Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 20:13:49 -0700 From: Sean Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com> To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Native Encryption for ZFS on FreeBSD CFT Message-ID: <AD1101E9-9A3E-41CB-B313-1723123C607B@ixsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2jGQWm9ZFM_0kqvEt41xrm%2BFTpq6JVK4iK-c20NQjisRg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPrugNomNQQUZZNgngYRjDEVEU=_KbE2pgG4ajO1Jr4%2BGov2gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPrugNpKOYe9VS6Q-Q43t4i51qsxrP0SKW76208rtX-ENWxS5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOtMX2jGQWm9ZFM_0kqvEt41xrm%2BFTpq6JVK4iK-c20NQjisRg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 21, 2018, at 8:11 PM, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote: > The last time I looked (which was a long time ago), Oracle's ZFS = encryption looked extremely vulnerable to watermarking attacks. Did = anybody ever fix that? This isn=E2=80=99t Oracle=E2=80=99s implementation, but I don=E2=80=99t = know how compatible or not it is with it. Sean.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD1101E9-9A3E-41CB-B313-1723123C607B>