Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 18:40:20 +0100 From: Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk> To: Brad Midgley <junkmail@pht.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.0.5-950622-SNAP on a big machine Message-ID: <510.806953220@palmer.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Jul 1995 09:33:27 MDT." <Pine.LNX.3.91.950728084259.6570A-100000@exodus.pht.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.LNX.3.91.950728084259.6570A-100000@exodus.pht.com>, Brad Midgl ey writes: >bt0: Bt946C/ 0-PCI/EISA/VLB(32bit) bus >bt0: reading board settings, busmastering, int=10 >bt0: version 4.23, sync, parity, 32 mbxs, 32 ccbs Hmm. Rod seems to be the expert on these cards. Rod? >how is 2940w support these days? :) Pretty good from what I hear. Justin (Gibbs) still has more work to do on it AFAIK before he'll be happy (if ever :-) ) >I should have reread my original post better. The mount (mount >linuxbox:/blah /mnt) works fine, but then accessing the mount point (/mnt) >produces the stale error. On another box running the fancy fancy caldera >linux system the mount works and then doesn't give the stale error, it >just claims "permission denied" Strange. I'd suspect a misconfiguration somewhere, but I'm no linux expert. >bnc and 10base-t combo (using the 10baset port). the irq it detected was >right in any case. >To reiterate: the system was installed on a scsi drive on a puny machine >to the side (which had a 3com) and then moved over. If the >network_interfaces wasn't the only thing to change, that could be the >problem. You also have to change one of the ifconfig_ lines below AFAIR, and I'd double check the default router, etc, which is slightly further down. >Jul 26 17:12:08 gandalf /kernel: ed0 at 0x280-0x29f irq 5 maddr 0xd8000 >msize 8192 on isa >Jul 26 17:12:08 gandalf /kernel: ed0: address 00:00:c0:3f:66:96, type >SMC8416C/SMC8416BT (16 bit) Looks ok. >yes, I did reboot and the kernel saw the card, ifconfiged it, etc., but >net traffic just wouldn't go through it. unplugging the smc from the net >even produced a: >Jul 26 16:23:38 gandalf /kernel: ed0: device timeout >in the log. Check that the output of ifconfig -a and netstat -r look reasonable. I've got a suspicious feeling that you haven't config'ed ed0 properly... >thanks for everyone's help. btw, samba under freebsd is very cool. If >only we'd had this long ago enough we wouldn't need an evil netware >server. now if only we had netatalk under freebsd :) Yeah - samba's nice :-) I did do a bit of work on porting CAP once, but I had to stop as I didn't have any Mac's talking Ethertalk on my net segment (or any Macs that I could talk to full stop). When I saw netatalk was kernel level, I didn't go any further as I had trouble seeing how I could fit it into the ``ports'' system without a lot of trouble, and I didn't want to import it into the CVS tree to be part of the kernel... Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?510.806953220>