Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 00:47:53 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: lists <lists@security.za.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NewCard / pccbb Message-ID: <200108060747.f767ls001881@mass.dis.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Aug 2001 20:52:13 MDT." <200108060252.f762qD103042@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108060425330.66904-100000@security.za.net> lists w
> rites:
> : I tried your suggestion below, and for some reason its still assigning the
> : same interrupt (whichever one I pick) to both the network card and the
> : wavelan card, and interstingly enough even if I remove one of them, its
> : still trying to get a routeable interrupt and the wavelan still doesnt
> : work. Any way that I can get this thing to give me a straight interrupt
> : on all cards without trying to do funny irq routing?
>
> Unlike the ISA world, it is OK to use the same IRQ in the pci world.
> Of course, Mike will have to say if this is sane considering your PIR table.
The $PIR table is really awful; it basically just says "all the standard
interrupts are available everywhere except the IDE controller and one
other place". We need a set of "preferential" interrupts, I think.
However, I'm missing some other pieces of the picture here, which is
really pissing me off. The dmesg output he sent me doesn't relate to
this at all.
--
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt]
V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108060747.f767ls001881>