Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:42:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Baer <christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: migrate from postfix to qmail Message-ID: <fd5qfg$2hh1$2@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> References: <48ce8d530709211747s615bc16by5766441066f19237@mail.gmail.com> <7CDF3AD1-DE13-46F6-A84F-B26FA3F97032@dragffy.com> <fd36g7$2bo0$5@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> <200709221918.53961.wundram@beenic.net> <fd5f15$2gup$1@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net> <46F66AB6.1090500@mikestammer.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:31:34 -0500 Eric wrote: >> Don't tell me, tell Dan Berstein (happy hunting): >> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html >> Observe point 5. > DJB has not honored at least one vulnerability in qmail. read the link i > posted early in this thread and decide for yourself. theres a word for > people who say one thing and do another... Why do you think I put the "happy hunting" there? Didn't travel quite as sarcastic as the smile on my face when I wrote it. :-) I don't like qmail much and I certainly don't like DJB's attitude in many cases. He had a few good ideas however and it certainly is not my part to try and take that away from him. Besides, I wasn't trying to prove anything about qmail being good or bad but just something about the configuration and the parsing. I haven't looked at qmail in years. Funny that the Version is still the same as when I used it (that could well be 10 years ago). Today I don't really care if qmail is secure. That would be a typical case of SEP. :-) Regards Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fd5qfg$2hh1$2>