Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:30:20 +0100 From: Niclas Zeising <zeising+freebsd@daemonic.se> To: roberthuff@rcn.com, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> Cc: Johannes Lundberg <johalun0@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vote: making wayland=on default Message-ID: <cb926297-0723-b81f-3c86-03ea2e85041f@daemonic.se> In-Reply-To: <23098.57983.262947.67141@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <CAECmPwtgtxJ-Nv6_LWoZC14UQ7TRZR%2B6Bg=1TK5=FuKz78hFNQ@mail.gmail.com> <3267de19-6e00-a72a-e2a7-abb322ccf7ac@rawbw.com> <23098.57983.262947.67141@jerusalem.litteratus.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/20/17 23:21, roberthuff@rcn.com wrote: > > To the list: > I salute X for doing its job, but I have no brand loyalty. If > something comes along that is some combination of a) more robust, b) > faster, and c) as easy to install/manage I'll switch in a heartbeat. > (Smaller footprint would be nice too.) Is that Wayland? Fact not > (yet) in evidence. > Is Wayland-on-FreeBSD in active development? If so: where - > other than ports@ - do I go to check the /status quo/? > Wayland and xwayland is part of the x11@ umbrella. The mailing list used is freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Regards! -- Niclas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb926297-0723-b81f-3c86-03ea2e85041f>