Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 02:53:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ernst de Haan <znerd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, cvs@FreeBSD.org, java@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Request for ports repocopy: www/jakarta-tomcat to www/jakarta-tomcat4 Message-ID: <20020401025311.A27366@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200204011047.MAA10896@smtp.hccnet.nl>; from znerd@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:31:57AM %2B0200 References: <200203302119.WAA24804@smtp.hccnet.nl> <20020330230544.A94142@xor.obsecurity.org> <200204011047.MAA10896@smtp.hccnet.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:31:57AM +0200, Ernst de Haan wrote: > > Is the tomcat4 port production-quality, or is it still in development? > > If yes, then perhaps it's better to move jakarta-tomcat to > > jakarta-tomcat3 instead. >=20 > Tomcat 4 is production-quality, just like Tomcat 3, but Tomcat 3 is indee= d=20 > going to be phased out. >=20 > So indeed renaming the current port to www/jakarta-tomcat3 is not such a = bad=20 > idea :) Okay, that's the option which gets my vote. Kris --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8qDwXWry0BWjoQKURAm+oAJ9lJ+jWgjAtqAn2eOaab5t028SxRACfWKMk InInEYPWb148d7s4zJs8JQw= =CsMV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020401025311.A27366>