Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:01:37 +0100 From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> To: dgilbert@interlog.com Cc: FreeBSD SCSI <freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CAM] Widening lun_id_t to 64-bits Message-ID: <52A829F1.2010206@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <52A7AEAE.1030307@interlog.com> References: <52A7830B.2090803@freebsd.org> <52A7A69E.3030703@interlog.com> <52A7AA76.3060208@interlog.com> <52A7AAA3.5050404@freebsd.org> <52A7AEAE.1030307@interlog.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/11/2013 01:15 AM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: [ .. ] > > BTW A T10 troublemaker tried to extend 8 byte LUNs to something > longer in order to hold a proposed conglomerate LUN format. > He did succeed in getting conglomerate LUN format in but not > extending LUNs beyond 8 bytes. However he did get a 65th bit in, > sort of. See the new LU_CONG bit in a standard INQUIRY > response (spc4r36n.pdf). > Gnaa. And I know that troublemaker. His company has been approaching me for conglomerate LUN support. _This_ will get fun. And I guess I need to update the patchset to handle this ... Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52A829F1.2010206>