Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:06:42 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org> Cc: kan@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need a code review Message-ID: <867iasfmrh.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <489B08F6.8060605@freebsd.org> (Oleksandr Tymoshenko's message of "Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:38:46 %2B0300") References: <20080729.161303.709402272.imp@bsdimp.com> <86r69buar0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <489B08F6.8060605@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org> writes: > openpam detects static modules build using cpp(1) condition: > #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__PIC__) && !defined(NO_STATIC_MODULES) > The problem is that gcc MIPS option -mabi-calls assumes -fpic for both > static and dynamic builds. So the question is: would defining > NO_STATIC_MODULES for MIPS be enough or it should be addressed > upstream? "upstream" in this case means me. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867iasfmrh.fsf>