Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 09:27:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> To: Simon Shapiro <Shimon@i-Connect.Net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Subject: Re: Final request for help with release. (DPT boot floppy) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970822092507.11588E-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.970821231148.Shimon@i-Connect.Net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 21 Aug 1997, Simon Shapiro wrote: > > Hi Tom Samplonius; On 22-Aug-97 you wrote: > > > > On Thu, 21 Aug 1997, Nate Williams wrote: > > > > > > And then I'll just go back to solaris which works :) > > > > > > And is slower than a dog. I guess you'd need that RAID system to get > > > decent I/O performance out of it. :) :) > > > > According to a simple test with dd that I ran on the identical > > hardware > > with 2.2-stable and Solaris 2.5.1 x86, the performance results are > > basically the same. > > > > Tom > > I take this as a compliment. Thank you. How high is the load in your test. > We reject here anything under 256 concurrent processes and release after > 1024 concurrent processes ran continually for 48 hours. Then it goes to > System Test which does who know what... For me a "simple" test is a single dd. Also, Solaris 2.51 is getting kind moldy anyhow. There are all kinds of patches to be installed, which I didn't want to get into. > Simon Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970822092507.11588E-100000>