Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:25:43 -0500
From:      Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: CEPH + FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <55EEEFE7.9080809@physics.umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1564D4FA-9BE1-4E37-8E91-F14A009D6B62@icloud.com>
References:  <CANw0z%2BVhYCPNWrjByXLf8yO9wA0sc05_8eVJsM-McjcGNU9KQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BKW7xQrN60kH37hu2Keja60a0huVjAyP6=SQNSrqus2EUMUMA@mail.gmail.com> <CANw0z%2BXrwK=6y%2BLpoiewc_eLDBYB5UZ5XpU6-YP0-K2FKwSa5w@mail.gmail.com> <A19FDEB5-1DEF-4EBF-8E9E-A1AD4688F1AA@icloud.com> <100306673.40344407.1441279047901.JavaMail.zimbra@uoguelph.ca> <1564D4FA-9BE1-4E37-8E91-F14A009D6B62@icloud.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/6/2015 12:19 AM, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> There are at least two distributed (multi-node) object stores for
> FreeBSD that I know of.
>
> One is glusterfs, for which I’m not even really clear on the status
> of the ports for.  I don’t see any glusterfs port in the master
> branch of https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports (or
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/tree/branches/2015Q3 for
> that matter).
>
> Our FreeNAS ports tree (https://github.com/freenas/ports), in which
> we have a bit more latitude to add and curate our own ports, has both
> a net/glusterfs and sysutils/glusterfs, from separate sources (looks
> like we need to clean things up) - net/glusterfs lists
> craig001@lerwick.hopto.org as the MAINTAINER and is at version 3.6.2.
> The sysutils/glusterfs port lists bapt@FreeBSD.org as the MAINTAINER
> and is at version 20140811.

For the sake of completeness MooseFS is also available on FreeBSD and 
probably also satisfies your crtieria (never used it, just seen it 
mentioned before on this list).

I'm still hoping to get a chance to play with glusterfs sometime in the 
near future mostly on Sci Linux, but with some opportunity to check it 
out on FreeBSD as well. Though my interest is more in a distributed 
*posix* filesystem, and we're already abusing HDFS via its fuse 
interface as such; perhaps I shouldn't be going down the same path again!

Graham



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55EEEFE7.9080809>