Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:23:03 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: usb2 moused issue (Microsoft Wireless Optical) Message-ID: <87tz6sj2aw.fsf@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <87tz6sdhb1.fsf@kobe.laptop> (Giorgos Keramidas's message of "Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:55:30 %2B0200") References: <87mycme9wc.fsf@kobe.laptop> <200902170848.28659.hselasky@freebsd.org> <87eixxpgya.fsf@kobe.laptop> <200902171436.58658.hselasky@freebsd.org> <87tz6sdhb1.fsf@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:55:30 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > The code of hid_report_size() is similar in old usb and the new usb > stack, but I am not sure about all the differences I see. The > calculation of `size' is done correctly with old usb code, so I am > testing the patch attached below now. It essentially pulls in the > hid_report_size() from the old usb code, with the if (h.kind == k) check > reversed to remove one spurious indentation level: No luck with the old usb code for hid_report_size() either. We may be looking at the wrong place. I'll build a kernel with a pre-usb2 stack and see what ums debugging shows for this mouse. If it used to work with size=2 then we might have to look elsewhere for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87tz6sj2aw.fsf>