Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 19:36:35 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> Cc: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache 2.2 ports Message-ID: <B5F3D52D-5119-4547-BA9C-7CCFC2BA4583@adamw.org> In-Reply-To: <540F829C.10301@gmx.de> References: <8DF8037F-F9EC-488D-86C4-0923789C174C@adamw.org> <8c7c200293f6d84e756d6eec4a1edcc2@mail.feld.me> <1078D71E80C9283D7F23513F@ogg.in.absolight.net> <540F7CFB.4050304@gmx.de> <F83736752D4F0BB901E2A3DE@atuin.in.mat.cc> <540F829C.10301@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 Sep, 2014, at 18:43, olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> wrote: > On 2014-09-10 00:22, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> +--On 10 septembre 2014 00:19:39 +0200 olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> = wrote: >> | On 2014-09-08 15:51, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> |>=20 >> |>=20 >> |> +--On 8 septembre 2014 13:41:54 +0000 Mark Felder = <feld@freebsd.org> >> |> wrote: >> |> | September 6 2014 10:24 AM, "Adam Weinberger" <adamw@adamw.org> = wrote:=20 >> |> |> apache team - >> |> |>=20 >> |> |> So it seems that setting USE_APACHE=3D22 doesn=92t actually = depend on >> |> |> apache-2.2. This means that every USE_APACHE=3D22 port is = broken, and as >> |> |> of right now won=92t have any 10.1 packages. >> |> |>=20 >> |> |> I=92m happy to go through and add "DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3D = APACHE=3D22=94 to >> |> |> this ports, but I wanted to check with you guys first. Is that = the >> |> |> right way to fix it? Is there something else that can be done = to make >> |> |> USE_APACHE=3D22 actually depend on apache-2.2? >> |> |>=20 >> |> |=20 >> |> | FYI I had to solve this problem today with the following two = make.conf >> |> | options: >> |> |=20 >> |> | DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3D apache=3D2.2 =20 >> |> |=20 >> |> | (note it's 2.2, not 22 -- bsd.default-versions.mk shows a period = should >> |> | be used) >> |> |=20 >> |> | APACHE_PORT=3D www/apache22 >> |> |=20 >> |> |=20 >> |> | Previously I only had the DEFAULT_VERSIONS entry and it worked = fine. >> |> | Suddenly I needed to add APACHE_PORT as well. This is with an up = to >> |> | date ports tree -- my packages build automatically every 8 = hours. >> |>=20 >> |> Yes, bapt sent a patch to fix that >> |> <https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/apache-version.diff>; >> |=20 >> |=20 >> | Based on the patch from bapt, I finished a new one (some cases = where >> | missing) >> | = https://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/bsd.apache.mk_20140909.di >> | ff >> |=20 >> | Perhaps someone wants to test and/or review before I commit this = fix >> | tomorrow. >>=20 >> Using our code review tool to post this patch would have been nice, = easier >> to comment on, and to look at, too :-) >>=20 >> <https://wiki.freebsd.org/CodeReview>; >=20 > Here you go: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D750 Hi Olli, With the old patch in place, there were a few build runs that took place = that showed some interesting effects. One that I don=92t think gets = resolved (and I=92m not sure that it really can be) is that packages for = a lot of 2.2-dependent ports will be unavailable. If they depend only on apache-2.2, no problem. But if they depend on ex. = mod_something, and the mod_something package is built with the = apache-2.4 default, then there will be a conflict when it tries to build = the new port. Really the python team is the only group to actually work around the = concurrency problem, but their solution is complex and cumbersome to = adapt to another system. It would be really nice if that concurrency = system could be extracted and used as an API for other subsystems. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org http://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B5F3D52D-5119-4547-BA9C-7CCFC2BA4583>