Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:01:53 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "portmgr@FreeBSD.org" <portmgr@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Packages lagging for 10.2 Message-ID: <20150908130153.GB38185@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <55EED86E.4010408@FreeBSD.org> References: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> <55EE8C6A.8040707@FreeBSD.org> <55EED86E.4010408@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:45:34PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote: > >> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a b= it > >> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is > >> updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaint= s, > >> I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) > >=20 > > You haven't done anything wrong. You're just using the quarterly > > package branch, which is a change in the defaults since 10.1-RELEASE. > >=20 > > Cheers, > >=20 > > Matthew > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Do you know if this was -announce'd to users? >=20 > If not, there's no such thing as too much communication. This is not a portmgr concern, but a re@ concern and yes it has been announ= ced as it is in the release note. Bapt --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlXu3EAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew1jgCfc2L99fnm0jAYLjNpZTOXYsPO 6ZUAn2SXQeASQUqc3QU3dkS7aMEaLNNv =OOZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150908130153.GB38185>