Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:03:02 +0000
From:      Sevan / Venture37 <venture37@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default
Message-ID:  <4ED653B6.1010607@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ED583D0.6030403@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <CADe0-4=DwzFj1NbJTeq3p92YGF_5yjhc-Yajn-hHNB_aca1k2g@mail.gmail.com> <20111129213413.GB14357@stack.nl> <4ED551B5.8090809@gmail.com> <CAMwoQQ6db_22AAxkWbaoe8rGaqw8K-LiKrATgXLnnjT7ZsGQNA@mail.gmail.com> <4ED583D0.6030403@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30/11/2011 01:16, Doug Barton wrote:
> What does dtrace have to do with profiled libs?

system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with 
profile support. on the other hand it could be argued that the system 
currently needs to be rebuilt anyway.


Sevan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED653B6.1010607>