Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 18:22:19 +0000 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: "David Xu" <davidxu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libpthread vs libthr. Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0611151022s38655a92ne2a7f450f97975bd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200611131701.25572.davidxu@freebsd.org> References: <20061110151247.GA64530@zone3000.net> <200611130707.10220.davidxu@freebsd.org> <3aaaa3a0611122020n461719nfad2adf378498f5a@mail.gmail.com> <200611131701.25572.davidxu@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13/11/06, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Monday 13 November 2006 12:20, Chris wrote: > > > > Interesting libthr can use system or process scope? as far as I am > > aware it was using whatever the default is for libthr. > > > > Chris > > FreeBSD 6.1, the default is libthr uses process scope, but I know > mysql explicitly uses system scope thread unless you forced it > to use process scope(there is a knob in the ports's Makefile). > if the mysql uses system scope (the default), you should see > the same effect with libpthread, i.e you said it starved your > server. > > David Xu > in that case it was using process scope as I have that knob enabled. thanks Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a0611151022s38655a92ne2a7f450f97975bd>