Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:01:48 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: What to do with Mozilla Message-ID: <1066244507.721.37.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <31B6987E-FF41-11D7-881B-003065ABFD92@mac.com> References: <31B6987E-FF41-11D7-881B-003065ABFD92@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-YJjck12lG/XVsUJdEYCH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 14:55, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Wednesday, October 15, 2003, at 02:12 PM, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > As some of you may be aware, Mozilla 1.5 was released today (along with > > Firebird and Thunderbird updates which will be handled soon). The > > question is, what do we do with Mozilla 1.4.x? Do you resurrect > > mozilla-vendor to hold 1.4.x for a while, or do we just update > > www/mozilla to 1.5, and say "to hell" with 1.4.x? Note, 1.6a is due=20 > > out > > shortly as well, and mozilla-devel will be updated to that. >=20 > Update www/mozilla to 1.5, but support 1.4 via a port named=20 > www/mozilla14 would provide backwards-compatibility in a fashion=20 > similar to other explicitly-versioned ports (squid, autoconf, python,=20 > etc). That's what mozilla-vendor used to be for. Why should we continue to support 1.4.x? Do you have something that requires it? Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: marcus@FreeBSD.org gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-YJjck12lG/XVsUJdEYCH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/jZmbb2iPiv4Uz4cRArrGAJ9W4H7JEoRamdwhPczcotOK8+hg1QCeMajM S8P6ZNIIFeI2hMZ0IOSqkOU= =VJcB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-YJjck12lG/XVsUJdEYCH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1066244507.721.37.camel>