Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:38:55 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Claude Buisson <clbuisson@orange.fr>
Cc:        FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Unable to mount the root fs on stable/8 r264339, GENERIC kernel, with MBR, FreeBSD slice, and UFS volume labels
Message-ID:  <201404161038.55512.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <534E5058.20106@orange.fr>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404111820160.9102@mail.fig.ol.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1404161006180.9102@mail.fig.ol.no> <534E5058.20106@orange.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:41:44 am Claude Buisson wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 10:09, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 19:44+0200, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:38+0200, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have a couple of uncritical systems running stable/8 r258344.
> >>> Hardware is Dell OptiPlex GX260, BIOS A09, which is the latest rev.
> >>>
> >>> The r264339 GENERIC kernel are unable to mount the root fs from the
> >>> hard drive using MBR, FreeBSD slice, and UFS volume labels.
> >>>
> >>> r258344 obviously can.
> >>>
> >>> I even tried regular device names like /dev/ad0s1a in /etc/fstab, and
> >>> at the mountroot> prompt, i.e. ufs:/dev/ad0s1a. The kernel still
> >>> cannot mount the root fs.
> >>>
> >>> The new kernel (r264339) does recognize the ad0 harddrive, and ad0 is
> >>> listed as one of the GEOM managed disk devices; acd0 being the other
> >>> one.
> >>>
> >>> Do I need to load additional geom modules, or is it a genuine bug?
> >>>
> >>> I have recreated the same conditions on a spare GX260, yes, I have
> >>> plenty of them.
> >>
> >> I believe I have identified r262226 as the offending commit.
> >>
> >> Maybe the flags integer is set to a bad value before the calls to
> >> resource_list_alloc().
> >>
> >> My spare system is currently recompiling r262221 of both world and
> >> kernel, and I hope to confirm this assumption in a few hours.
> >
> > Confirmed.
> >
> >> If all goes well, I intend to move forward to the latest revision of
> >> stable/8, back out the change done to sys/dev/pci/pci.c in r262226,
> >> recompile world and kernel, install the kernel, and if successfully,
> >> I'll install world as well.
> >
> > Confirmed, stable/8 r264519 with r262226 backed out does indeed work
> > on a Dell OptiPlex GX260, BIOS A09.
> >
>=20
> Just another data point related to r262226:
>=20
> Yesterday, I upgraded a stable/8 system from r260539 to r264426, which co=
uld not=20
> finish booting. In my case, it stopped just after detecting an agp card (=
and=20
> could boot if agp was disabled by device.hints).
>=20
> Reverting r262226 gave me back a fully usable system.
>=20
> This system is also a Dell, but a (oldish) Dimension 4550 BIOS A08.
>=20
> > Any chance anyone would like to dig deeper into the matter?
> > Should I file a PR?
> >
>=20
> I think so, if jhb (cced) keep being interested in stable/8..
>=20
> BTW, this morning I succeeded in booting a stable/10 snapshot r264194 USB=
 stick=20
> on this machine.

Can you get a verbose dmesg with and without the change?

=2D-=20
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201404161038.55512.jhb>