Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:42:32 -0800 (PST) From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/c2ps Makefile Message-ID: <199802272342.PAA18633@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980227174904.316J-100000@localhost> (message from Chuck Robey on Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:54:22 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > Agreed. I understood Satoshi's comment to say that package names should * > be lower case, implying that a package name of "a2ps-Letter-x.y.z" isn't * > proper. I may have easily misunderstood. That wasn't what I meant. The port was accepting "A4" and "LETTER" as the only options, so I changed it to be more tolerant. The package name using "a4" and "letter" was already there too. * Oh. I wasn't watching very well, it's more likely I did. If so, either * way, it's a simple change. The only thing about the port was that there Ok. Currently a2ps43, c2ps, lprps, mp and psutils use "a4/letter" and a2ps and enscript use "A4/Letter". Maybe we can make them all use all-lowercase names (just for the sake of consistency). * was care given to the possibility that a user might make one choice during * the build phase, and another during the package phase, thus mislabeling * the package. There's a cookie dropped in the work dir to prevent this, That can be solved by having one port per papersize. No confusion for the user too. The only problem is for other ports that depend on these. But package dependencies are currently broken for those cases anyway, I don't see a big loss. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802272342.PAA18633>