Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:26:09 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>
Cc:        "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, current@freebsd.org, marcel@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: mtree again 
Message-ID:  <200009240026.SAA08490@harmony.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:02:48 PDT." <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com> 
References:  <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com>  <20000915033837.A564@nagual.pp.ru> <200009142341.RAA00700@harmony.village.org> <20000915043925.A83698@nagual.pp.ru> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com> Marcel Moolenaar writes:
: Is their any harm in just keeping the -P flag as a no-op and optionally
: remove it at some later time (for backward compatibility)?

-P is non-standard, was introduced only in July and therefore we don't 
need to keep it around for any reason at all.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200009240026.SAA08490>