Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Oct 2001 10:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc:        Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: time_t not to change size on x86 
Message-ID:  <200110271706.f9RH6ga47601@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <20011027070109.D02E9380A@overcee.netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> >     it because it means that all the 64 bit issues can be worked out by
:> >     the larger community running on standard intel platforms.  Other people
:> >     like it because it (obviously) solves the 2038 problem.
:> 
:> I do not like it because it creates **additional** problems that will
:> appear *only* on the i386.  -current has got enough problems without
:> bullet holes through the feet of the primary platform.
:> 
:> I'm quite happy with changing from 'int' to 'long', but *not* quad.
:
:As a followup, I wont fight to the bitter end if people are really
:convinced that it is a good idea and are going to firmly commit themselves
:to pick up the mess in both the src and entire ports tree.  That means
:submitting patches back to the original distribution producers.
:
:But that the idea of it still gives me the creeps.  I believe we'll be
:chasing bugs from this for years on the i386.
:
:> >     DES and I have allocated time to work on it starting mid-november.
:> >     Nobody else has comitted time yet.
:> > 
:> > 					-Matt
:
:Cheers,
:-Peter
:--
:Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au

    I think the absolute worst that can happen is that moving time_t to
    64 bits will have the same sort of impact on ports that moving off_t to 
    64 bits had.  I don't recall the off_t change as causing any significant
    pain.  FreeBSD had it from the get-go, but most of our ports were 
    compiled on systems with 32 bit off_t's.

    I think the reason for this can be attributed towards a general shift
    away from K&R and towards ANSI prototypes.

    Simply changing time_t from an int to a long for 64 bit architectures
    will not lessen the amount of work required to make it work properly
    on 32 bit architectures 'later'.  I consider the approach worthless.
    If we are going to change time_t we damn well ought to fix it for all
    architectures all at once and get it over with.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110271706.f9RH6ga47601>