Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:11:44 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/libvanessa_adt Makefile pkg-plist ports/devel/libvanessa_adt/files patch-ltmain.sh Message-ID: <20040324181144.GA6200@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <1080147439.51026.15.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <200403231608.i2NG8XmM046696@repoman.freebsd.org> <40608C18.60103@dougbarton.net> <20040324165038.GB3323@dragon.nuxi.com> <1080147439.51026.15.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 05:57:20PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > PORTREVISION should be raised when there's a change (even minor) in the > package. Axing a file from plist is a good reason for PORTREVISION > raise. NO, it's not. Unless that removed file cause the binary to act differently. There is nothing wrong with having a useless file on my disk, that will get rm'ed when then port is upgraded. This is exactly the PORTREVISION churn that shouldn't be happening. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040324181144.GA6200>