Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:41:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1308260329190.3920@trevally.site> In-Reply-To: <521751AF.6040905@gmail.com> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <CAE-m3X324rbdP_C=az4eO-EkMcR-yFAeRG7S4q%2BMUsnMezGddw@mail.gmail.com> <521751AF.6040905@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > I object. Many ports that compiles perfectly on gcc 4.2.1 can't be > compiled with lang/gcc. I checked this once and the number of ports > that require strictly gcc 4.2.1 was bigger for me then number of > ports that can't be compiled with clang but fill fine on lang/gcc. > > I'll gonna recheck whether lang/gcc42 is sufficient for them. But I > have that bad feeling... If there are ports that use USE_GCC=any and do not build with lang/gcc, these should have USE_GCC=4.2 -- without a '+'! -- not USE_GCC=any. It'll be great if you can fix any such port. Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1308260329190.3920>