Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:32:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...? Message-ID: <20031001083225.K685@leelou.in.tern> In-Reply-To: <20030930232506.GA31027@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20030930221148.54E7E5D07@ptavv.es.net> <20030930194544.H94686@ganymede.hub.org> <20030930232506.GA31027@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:04:51AM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > > > > > are either of these enhancements back-patchable to the 4.x fsck, or do > > > they require some non-4.x compatible changes to work? > > > > It's not just the fsck application itself, background fsck basically needs > > file system snapshots, which are only available on UFS2, and I'm not sure > > if they can be backported to UFS1 at all. > > As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available > on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates > UFS2. Oh, yeah, sorry, I think I got that wrong :-/. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031001083225.K685>