Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:15:48 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: UFS2 now the default creation type on 5.0-CURRENT Message-ID: <20030423021331.W17870@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20030422125608.GB8074@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <20030420192319.GB4963@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030420174551.16891t-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20030421231756.H11214@gamplex.bde.org> <20030422210632.U16843@gamplex.bde.org> <20030422125608.GB8074@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, David Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: > > I tried this, but it had no effect since FS_TO_VBA() is never actually used. > > So there is a much better optimization for it :-). I think this makes ma() > > unused too. > > In that case, I'm wondering how I managed to save a few bytes by > adding ma(). (Isn't the other macro that uses it expanded twice?) I deleted too much context, so couldn't remeber if ma() was used twice, then guessed wrong. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030423021331.W17870>