Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 13:40:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: if_simloop: can't handle af=0 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980614133916.6386E-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199806142002.NAA07854@austin.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm still looking at this On Sun, 14 Jun 1998, John Polstra wrote: > In article <199806140927.RAA03185@spinner.netplex.com.au>, > Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> wrote: > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message <Pine.GSO.3.96.980613234028.17153A-100000@echonyc.com> Snob Art Ge > > nre writes: > > > : My -current kernel from about 2 this afternoon seems to be falling > > > : through the switch statement in net/if_loop.c to the default label -- > > > : the address family variable is apparently set to 0 (AF_UNSPEC?). > > > > > > I'm seeing the same thing on my laptop (a libretto with an 3C589D). > > > > It would seem that something is trying to transmit to an address that > > doesn't have an address... > > No, it was coming from the ARP code, where the address family was > explicitly being set to AF_UNSPEC. I think (but didn't check > carefully) that the address at that point is a link-level address. > -- > John Polstra jdp@polstra.com > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA > "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.980614133916.6386E-100000>