Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:40:15 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: billf@jade.chc-chimes.com Cc: shige@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/wemi-xemacs-current - Imported sources Message-ID: <199908062040.NAA10114@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908061534020.45391-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> (message from Bill Fumerola on Fri, 6 Aug 1999 15:35:45 -0400 (EDT)) References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908061534020.45391-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> * I was actually just wondering how many emacs we could have without them * becoming their own category. I also wondered how different 50 versions * of emacs could be. The multiple emacs ports are all quite different if you use multibyte character sets. As for the rest of them (semi/wemi/flim/apel...), they are not emacs but are support libraries (for lack of better term) to handle character input, MIME support, etc. Making a new category might be a good idea at this point though. More than half of "editors" seems to be occupied by emacsen and their buddies. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908062040.NAA10114>