Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 07 Jan 2008 08:45:11 -0800
From:      Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>
To:        Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com>
Cc:        Rafal Jaworowski <raj@FreeBSD.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 132485 for review
Message-ID:  <47825717.7030604@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4782418E.1030400@semihalf.com>
References:  <200801041525.m04FPIrt011288@repoman.freebsd.org> <47815371.9020501@freebsd.org> <4782418E.1030400@semihalf.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Rafal,

 > So the idea is to switch
> over to thread0's kstack immediately before mi_startup(), so that temp stack
> we were running on can be recycled etc. right?

  That's right, and you get the advantages of the guard pages allocated 
for thread0.

later,

Peter.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47825717.7030604>