Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:52:45 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/26368: ``MAKEDEV ad0e'' fails Message-ID: <20010405225245.B402@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200104051940.f35Je3j90883@freefall.freebsd.org>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 12:40:03PM -0700 References: <200104051940.f35Je3j90883@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 12:40:03PM -0700, mi@aldan.algebra.com wrote: > The following reply was made to PR bin/26368; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: mi@aldan.algebra.com > To: Søren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> > Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, > jkh@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: bin/26368: ``MAKEDEV ad0e'' fails > Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:37:03 -0400 (EDT) > > On 5 Apr, Søren Schmidt wrote: > = It seems Mikhail Teterin wrote: > = > > = > cd /dev && sh MAKEDEV ad0e > = > bad unit for disk in: ad0e > = > > = > Note, that this device is created by install, but for more drives > = > one has to do things like ad8e, which is no longer possible :( > = > = Nope, you just use ad0 or ad8 and the devices you need will be made... > > Khmm, indeed, thanks. I guess, the priority of this bug should now go > down, but it is still a bug, is not it? But is it really? It could be considered just a case of MAKEDEV failing when invoked with arguments it's not supposed to support.. G'luck, Peter -- If I had finished this sentence, To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010405225245.B402>