Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:58:16 +0100 From: Thomas <tomsoft@Netz-Werker.COM> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 Message-ID: <20001220085816.29295@Netz-Werker.NET> In-Reply-To: <200012200126.SAA05246@harmony.village.org>; from Warner Losh on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 06:26:03PM -0700 References: <20001219171630.A84990@dragon.nuxi.com> <200012192155.eBJLt8n75030@freefall.freebsd.org> <20001219171630.A84990@dragon.nuxi.com> <200012200126.SAA05246@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, > However, having said that I've been using 16k/4k on my laptop for > months now and there's been no problems booting off of it, nor with > crashes. The -c I used was even more radical (something like 160, > iirc). During growfs development we tested growfs against almost all various ffs parameterizations possible (even the today not that much usefull rotational block layout tables). In those permanent test loops (for meanwhile 4 months) there we never encountered any problem. I agree, that this test of cause doesn't need to find all possible problems, especially as in our test there is never more than one thread accessing the filesystem when it is mounted. But it gives an idea. Thomas -- Th.-H.v.Kamptz Die Netz-Werker GmbH To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001220085816.29295>