Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:50:24 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/osf1 osf1_misc.c src/sys/amd64/linux32 linux32_machdep.c src/sys/compat/freebsd32 freebsd32_misc.c src/sys/compat/linux linux_misc.c src/sys/compat/svr4 svr4_misc.c src/sys/fs/procfs procfs_status.c src/sys/kern init_main.c ...
Message-ID:  <20050228205024.GA60713@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200502281509.56754.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200502280926.j1S9QD9g004406@repoman.freebsd.org> <200502281509.56754.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:09:56PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 28 February 2005 04:26 am, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > obrien      2005-02-28 09:26:13 UTC
> >
> >   FreeBSD src repository
> >
> >   Modified files:        (Branch: RELENG_5)
> >     sys/alpha/osf1       osf1_misc.c
> >     sys/amd64/linux32    linux32_machdep.c
> >     sys/compat/freebsd32 freebsd32_misc.c
> >     sys/compat/linux     linux_misc.c
> >     sys/compat/svr4      svr4_misc.c
> >     sys/fs/procfs        procfs_status.c
> >     sys/kern             init_main.c kern_acct.c kern_clock.c
> >                          kern_exit.c kern_proc.c kern_resource.c
> >                          kern_synch.c kern_time.c subr_trap.c
> >                          tty.c
> >     sys/sys              proc.h resourcevar.h syscallsubr.h
> >   Log:
> >   MFC: Rework how we store process times in the kernel such that we always
> >   store the raw values including for child process statistics and only
> > compute the system and user timevals on demand.
> >   (See the 2004-10-05 18:51:12 UTC jhb commit for full details.)
> 
> NO!!! This breaks the ABI for all kernel modules.  I would have already MFC'd 
> it first if not for that.  You should have asked me before MFcing this. :(

There are tons of "MFC after:" commits that people never got around to
MFC'ing.  I'm doing those now, and this was one of them.  I'm seriously
concerned that we don't diverge 6-CURRENT/5-STABLE as we did in the
4.x/3.x days.

We've already discussed dealing this commit on IRC, so I'll end here.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050228205024.GA60713>