Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:13:36 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r249790 - in head/sys/mips: include mips Message-ID: <6CE3FE8F-25EB-4B13-967B-7C3E6EC3E986@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <D45D7DBF-16C6-46D1-8D15-DCC9A50CE39B@FreeBSD.org> References: <201304230938.r3N9cIV0047961@svn.freebsd.org> <CACVs6=8hrE3uQSfBPv=MXcr%2B9-WKrTP7XonZx15H4imk8DPyww@mail.gmail.com> <D45D7DBF-16C6-46D1-8D15-DCC9A50CE39B@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:49 AM, David Chisnall wrote: > On 24 Apr 2013, at 03:40, Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 >> I don't see why we shouldn't just replace regnum.h with the NetBSD >> version, and merge that to all active branches. Since you're trying >> to update these headers, Warner, it would be great if you could do >> that. >=20 > That would probably be sensible. The original problem that motivated = these changes was that ptrace returns the registers in the wrong order, = which is visible in gdb, which displays the registers in the wrong = order. The comment in our gdb indicates that we have the same trap = frame layout as NetBSD, but it turns out that we don't... We will shortly. I'll be reworking this... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6CE3FE8F-25EB-4B13-967B-7C3E6EC3E986>