Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 23:09:22 -0700 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable Message-ID: <199910260609.XAA05063@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> "Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable" (Oct 10, 6:12pm)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 10, 6:12pm, Tony Finch wrote: } Subject: Re: merging current's jail functionality to stable } Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> wrote: } > } >While I have a need for the jail functionality, I also need a working a } >working nullfs implementation to use with it. Somehow I don't thing we'll } >see a working nullfs in 3.x, so I guess I can wait for 4.x. } } Is this so that you can share the same /usr partition between all the } jails? Nope. I want to mount a read-write subtree in one part of the filesystem with the processes in a jail (where it will be read-only). One example is allowing a jailed user to update a set of html documents in a specific directory tree, and sharing this directory tree on a read-only basis with a jailed web server. I also want to export all the executables to each jail via read-only mounts without needing lots of tiny partitions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199910260609.XAA05063>