Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:55:56 -0700
From:      Michael Haro <mharo@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        mharo@FreeBSD.org, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org>, "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <jeff-ml@mountin.net>, ports@FreeBSD.org, will@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: Ports layout reorganization (Re: ports tree idea:     Combine DESCR and COMMENT)
Message-ID:  <20001003205556.A11981@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <39D9C856.BF69AE64@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 02:51:50PM +0300
References:  <"Jeffrey <vqcsnqjin86.fsf_-_@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <4.3.2.20000929140626.00c3fa00@207.227.119.2> <4.3.2.20000929220000.00e0d7e0@207.227.119.2> <vqc7l7uglwu.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <20000930085603.V75085@puck.firepipe.net> <20001001223942.A49213@FreeBSD.org> <39D9C856.BF69AE64@FreeBSD.org>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 02:51:50PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Michael Haro wrote:
>=20
> > On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 08:56:03AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote:
> > >
> > > I'll take care of it and review with Michael for portlint.  That said=
, I
> > > should probably add PORTREVISION/PORTEPOCH && INSTALLS_SHLIB.
> >
> > That sounds like a good plan to me =3D)
> > BTW, I'm still alive.  Just really busy at work.
>=20
> Michael and Will,
>=20
> BTW please considering a more modulared structure for portlint2, so anybo=
dy can
> easily add his own checking module (preferrably just as a separate file l=
oaded
> at runtime) w/o the need to hack huge monolitic script and disturb mainta=
iners
> at every small occasion.

That was one of the things I had planned for portlint 3 (should I ever=20
have time to work on it).  I hadn't quite gotten as far as seperate files
but I had planned to use seperate subroutines for each check so that
additional checks could be implemented by just adding a new subroutine.

There is probably a small preformance hit by doing this, but I think it
makes things easier to read and isn't that great of an impact.

If you would like to help finish converting the checks in portlint 2=20
(current version) into portlint 3 (future version), check out
http://people.freebsd.org/~mharo/portlint3/ to see what is currently
done.

Michael

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: kxkJafOleaw5vrTaFLym4Kbw67lUIXwa

iQA/AwUBOdqqTOKkMfh7htP/EQKj2wCeNW0zycS4Y/JU2kVJL6ubrWUI5X4An1hf
hIzkBt4EHkn/g3Ng6B+VJGeX
=Hi/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001003205556.A11981>