Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 18:16:57 -0500 From: Hiten Pandya <hiten@unixdaemons.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Removal of netns Message-ID: <20030304231657.GA99686@unixdaemons.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303041453430.42494-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <20030305004730.A13129@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303041453430.42494-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer (Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:53:56PM -0800) wrote: > I thought nwfs used it? > > > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > Is there a compelling reason why I shouldn't remove netns? That is, does > > it serve a purpose now that it could not serve if it was moved to the > > Attic? That's netncp if I am not mistaken and thanks to Tim and Max Khon, it's now fixed, IIRC. Kudos to them. :-) -- Hiten Pandya (hiten@unixdaemons.com, hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030304231657.GA99686>