Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:44:46 +0100 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Adriaan de Groot <zomer2018@weirdbump.com> Cc: Koichiro Iwao <meta@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r485911 - in head/net-p2p/namecoin: . files Message-ID: <5zwk-s2oh-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <9916419.mF7Y50I3LY@beastie.bionicmutton.org> (Adriaan de Groot's message of "Mon, 26 Nov 2018 08:28:50 %2B0100") References: <201811260204.wAQ24wC6035650@repo.freebsd.org> <9916419.mF7Y50I3LY@beastie.bionicmutton.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adriaan de Groot <zomer2018@weirdbump.com> writes: > On Monday, 26 November 2018 03:04:58 CET Koichiro Iwao wrote: > >> Also, switched to Qt5 because net/qt4-network is required by dependency >> however it fails to build with OpenSSL 1.1.1. FreeBSD base OpenSSL has >> been switched to 1.1.1 since FreeBSD 12. > > Thank you for switching. If any good comes from the long-term brokenness of > qt4-network in the face of newer OpenSSL, it is that it now forces ports to > switch to Qt5. Qt4 is set to go away in the first quarter of 2019, so switching > is recommended anyway. Where "Qt4 is set to go away" documented? I mean something more formal than a blog post by one of kde@ team. If you don't engage maintainers either via EXPIRATION_DATE or by opening bugs few will notice, let alone ask upstream for a fix or come up with one themselves.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5zwk-s2oh-wny>