Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 13:27:04 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Andrew Gordon <arg@arg1.demon.co.uk> Cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 3com 3c509 card Message-ID: <34992437.46914518@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971218005109.17820A-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971218005109.17820A-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Dec 1997 01:15:50 +0000 (GMT), Andrew Gordon <arg@arg1.demon.co.uk> wrote: >Note that a _standard_ cycle isn't the fastest possible cycle: 16-bit >memory cycles have one wait state, but a board can generate 0 w/s >cycles by holding NOWS* low. Since this is only applicable to memory >cycles What prevents use of 0 WS for I/O cycles? John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34992437.46914518>