Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:23:43 +0800
From:      leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Need to build some systems this week. Snapshots?
Message-ID:  <20030828182343.GA89926@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030828110441.02d9f580@popserver.sfu.ca>
References:  <5.0.2.1.1.20030828103403.02d683a8@popserver.sfu.ca> <200308280638.AAA19221@lariat.org> <5.0.2.1.1.20030828110441.02d9f580@popserver.sfu.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:16:11AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
>   Because FreeBSD Update identifies the particular binaries affected by a 
> source code change and only distributes those, it also saves bandwidth -- 
> updating a 4.8-RELEASE system using FreeBSD Update uses less than half the 
> bandwidth required to update the source tree with cvsup.
Does this include kernel binary patches? Or is this possible at all? (kernel patch)

Jiawei Ye


-- 
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
               --inspired by The Tao of Programming



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030828182343.GA89926>