Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 22:56:18 -0800 (PST) From: fbsdmail@dnswatch.com To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is Gnome2 not supported on the amd64 ARCH? Message-ID: <90fd957c01e95dcfd287427792d91351.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> In-Reply-To: <20110102192946.2ab5429a@centaur.5550h.net> References: <9193ef9ae95084284226832557f8c755.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102125137.4423cb08@ernst.jennejohn.org> <15cc929589a6426f0dad97fac66ed328.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102150551.24f5193e@ernst.jennejohn.org> <0cdfb22d89c8f85ec31704c35982e0e2.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> <20110102192946.2ab5429a@centaur.5550h.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, January 2, 2011 10:29 am, 文鳥 wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 06:42:27 -0800 (PST) > fbsdmail@dnswatch.com wrote: > > >> Hello again, and thanks for your response. >> I commented it out after responding to your response, and >> it happily built. I just figured I'd use the CPUTYPE?= option to gain >> better amd64 profiling, but apparently it's only _really_ available for >> the i386 CPU's. I say that because I've always used that option when >> building on those ARCH types, and never ran into a problem. Oh well, >> hopefully sometime son, it'll be better supported on the amd64 - fingers >> crossed. :) >> >> Thanks again for taking the time to respond. >> >> >> --Chris >> >> >> > > Please take a look at /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf > It clearly states that athlon-mp is for the Intel x86 arch _only_. > Wikipedia tells us the same > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_mp#Athlon_XP.2FMP). Therefore I > assume, that (since you've got amd64 running), your CPU isn't really an > "athlon-mp", but rather one of the following (again from the make.conf > example): opteron, athlon64, nocona, prescott, core2 > > > PS: I personally use "native", since that gives me the same level of > optimization as choosing the correct CPU by hand would. Additionally, you > might consider compiling ports with gcc45, since the base cc doesn't > support newer CPU features like e.g. SSE4.2. Right you are. :) As I stated to Luchesar, in my last reply, it's been awhile since I actually researched make(1) && make.conf(5). The last amd64 boxes I built using ths CPUTYPE?=athlon-mp were on 8-(PRE)RELEASE. In fact the only reason I chose athlon-mp is because one of the first ports I built echoed that in the config flags during the build. So without any research, I figured that to be (howeer mis- takenly) the correct choice. :) Thank you for your thoughtful reply. --Chris > > Best regards > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- kern: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?90fd957c01e95dcfd287427792d91351.dnswclient>