Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:55:16 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, ache@nagual.pp.ru, ru@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/stdlib strtol.c strtoll.c strtoq.c strtoul.c strtoull.c strtouq.c Message-ID: <3B9612A4.7F70AE5B@FreeBSD.org> References: <200109042329.f84NTCo57103@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[redirected to ports@] Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 4 Sep, David O'Brien wrote: > >> What do you mean exactly? Most of our libc files not have rcsids > > > > That does not mean they should not have them. rcsid's just haven't > > been added yet. I explicited added them to the files you removed them > > from when I added *ll(). Please put them back just the way they were. > > BTW, most of the patches in the ports-tree don't have such IDs, but some > do. Since those IDs are discarded as early as at the "make patch" stage, > I think they are pretty useless -- they don't make it to the compiled > binaries anyway. But what's the general opinion? No, they are pretty useful, IMO. When the user has a problem you can verify version of patches he has and after the problem is resolved tell him "update patxh-xx to the rev.Y.X and you'll be fine". NetBSD for example has $NetBSD$ in all their patches, this also helpful when you need to steal patch from the NetBSD ports collection and add it into FreeBSD one. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B9612A4.7F70AE5B>