Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 23:32:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Dale Scott <dalescott@shaw.ca> To: Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Technological advantages over Linux Message-ID: <838706788.121367025.1595568764100.JavaMail.zimbra@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <20200724043553.GA62650@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20200214121620.GA80657@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200724032840.GA61047@admin.sibptus.ru> <bb4b45c49da2c1b3a4cb66512eb52b710c7d1da7.camel@adminart.net> <20200724043553.GA62650@admin.sibptus.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The greatest technical advantage is that FreeBSD doesn't get in the way as you accomplish the real work you want to do (assuming the real work isn't polishing your desktop). ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Victor Sudakov" <vas@sibptus.ru> > To: "freebsd-questions" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> > Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2020 10:35:53 PM > Subject: Re: Technological advantages over Linux > hw wrote: >> > >> >> You can add that NFS in FreeBSD is a catastrophy. Bascially, you can only >> export whole file systems with permissions applying to the whole file >> system, and that practically makes NFS unusable. That means >> >> >> 9. very limited NFS support in FreeBSD >> >> > > My experience with NFS is rather limited. I use it to export filesystems r/o > with ISO images, music and such, nothing sophisticated that would > require granular permissions etc. > >> Besides this, setting up NFS in FreeBSD is the opposite of user friendly. > > Maybe ZFS+NFSv4 is better (did not try it myself though)? > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?838706788.121367025.1595568764100.JavaMail.zimbra>