Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:17:10 +0000
From:      Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@clara.net>
To:        Shivaram Upadhyayula <shivaram.u@quadstor.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS/compression/performance
Message-ID:  <20111101211710.GA36797@voi.aagh.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAN-_EfxVZchM-ByjbtMO2kcjiU_=u7GF5q5_9rz7HHeL09Vn0g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110122159410.26591@Elmer.dco.penx.com> <CAN-_EfxVZchM-ByjbtMO2kcjiU_=u7GF5q5_9rz7HHeL09Vn0g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Shivaram Upadhyayula (shivaram.u@quadstor.com) wrote:

> I have recently started using ZFS and during that time i have tried out
> ZFS with lzf (http://oldhome.schmorp.de/marc/liblzf.html) and it seems
> to perform much better, both in speed and ratio over lzjb.
> 
> Anyway my point is that, somewhere down the line other compression
> algorithms should be evaluated. gzip seems slow and it looks like lzjb
> may not be sufficient. For anyone interested, I have attached some of
> the tests i had run and the diff for lzf support.

No you haven't :)

-- 
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
    http://hur.st/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111101211710.GA36797>