Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:50:20 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NAT question Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK0%2BYnEzagH--VnyNqpYArH2eVnmVhQEcR3ST8yYtRJZ%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> References: <3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it > wrote: > > Hello, I'm still migrating machines from linux to FreeBSD. I'm wondering if > my translation from this iptables linux rule > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.7.234/32 -d 172.16.1.0/24 -o > eth1 -j > MASQUERADE > > (which means moreless if Mr 192.168.7.234 wherever he comes fom passes > through our eth1 interface to go to 172.16.1 network should get our > eth1 address instead of his) > > is moreless correctly translated in FreeBSD ipnat rules as > > map em0 192.168.7.234/32 -> 0/32 > > or I'm missing something? You might want to use a more integrated and supported FW such as IPFW or PF to do NAT. -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK0%2BYnEzagH--VnyNqpYArH2eVnmVhQEcR3ST8yYtRJZ%2Bw>