Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Feb 1996 14:01:20 -0500 (EST)
From:      "matthew c. mead" <mmead@Glock.COM>
To:        wollman@lcs.mit.edu (Garrett A. Wollman)
Cc:        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, kmitch@vt.edu, questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: proxy ARP on ethernet??
Message-ID:  <199602151901.OAA19847@Glock.COM>
In-Reply-To: <9602151854.AA12781@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> from "Garrett A. Wollman" at Feb 15, 96 01:54:34 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett A. Wollman wrote:

> <<On Thu, 15 Feb 1996 13:04:31 -0500 (EST), "matthew c. mead" <mmead@Glock.COM> said:

> > 	You should be able to set it up so that you only have to use different
> > *IP addresses* on each interface.

> No you should not be able to do so.  It might be possible, but only
> because of insufficient error checking in the kernel.

	Proxy arping with packet forwarding having two interfaces on the same
subnet is not supposed to be a valid option?  I've know a lot of people to do
this when the provider has hubs that only allow one mac address per port...


-matt

-- 
Matthew C. Mead

mmead@Glock.COM
http://www.Glock.COM/~mmead/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602151901.OAA19847>