Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:33:43 +0100 From: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: How's linux-ibm-jdk14 in the memory footprint department? Message-ID: <1478416187.20031209193343@buz.ch> In-Reply-To: <006a01c3be80$27f22da0$0200a8c0@veggy.org> References: <005301c3be64$cb8369a0$0200a8c0@veggy.org> <006a01c3be80$27f22da0$0200a8c0@veggy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Nicolas, Tuesday, December 9, 2003, 7:12:55 PM, you wrote: > What I'd like to know is whether IBM's implementation of the JVM > happens to use a little less memory. I think 203 MB is too much for > a console application, and that box only has 64 MB of RAM. I did > install linux-ibm-jdk14 to check this myself, but found out it > requires the USER_LDT setting in the kernel, and I can't reboot > because of a stupid setting since I'm running important services on > the box. > Any linux-ibm-jdk14 fans out there? Well I had installed it the last time when I built the native JDK. I agree that 203MB is too much for a normal console app but I'd say forget about using Java on machines with less than 256 or more likely even 512MB memory (personally, I develop on a 1GB machine RAM these days but that's W2K eating resources, too) Best regards, Gabriel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1478416187.20031209193343>