Date: 04 Mar 2003 18:32:03 -0500 From: Chris Fowler <cfowler@outpostsentinel.com> To: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removal of netns Message-ID: <1046820725.6491.53.camel@devel> In-Reply-To: <20030305102617.A27891@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20030305004730.A13129@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303041453430.42494-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20030305102617.A27891@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What is IPX currently being used for? Legacy systems? I've been stuck in TCP/IP land for many years now. Have been lucky enough to not run into any IPX. On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 18:26, Tim Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:53:56PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > I thought nwfs used it? > > nwfs uses netipx. From what I can tell, netipx was based on netns. > > > Tim > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1046820725.6491.53.camel>