Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:58:24 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver <alejandro@varnet.biz> To: alejandro@varnet.biz Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: [SOLVED] Re: OPTIONS problem Message-ID: <20050428195824.1e46e96a@ale.varnet.bsd> In-Reply-To: <2109.200.115.214.28.1114713334.squirrel@webmail1.pair.com> References: <2109.200.115.214.28.1114713334.squirrel@webmail1.pair.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 15:35:34 -0300 (ART)
"Alejandro Pulver" <alejandro@varnet.biz> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am making a meta-port that has options to choose which components to
> install.
>
> Each component also has its own options, but when they are built as
> dependencies, they do not prompt for their own options (neither use
> the defaults), but they inherite the options from the meta-port.
>
> Is this supposed to work like this?
>
> How can I make dependencies prompt for their own options?
>
> I found some ports use a script for the configuration (in
> "scripts/config", and create a "Makefile.inc"). Does it have
> adventages over the OPTIONS variable?
>
> Thanks and Best Regards,
> Ale
Sorry, I was using many ports with the same PORTNAME but different
PKGNAMESUFFIX (and OPTIONS uses ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}${PORTNAME}).
Best Regards,
Ale
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050428195824.1e46e96a>