Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:52:01 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Sean Page <Sean.Page@epsb.ca>
Cc:        "'freebsd-ports@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Name resolution performance in BIND9
Message-ID:  <20041113025201.GA13657@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <1FE05C67E513D9119F31000F1F6C220742C3@EXCHANGE08>
References:  <1FE05C67E513D9119F31000F1F6C220742C3@EXCHANGE08>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 03:16:51PM -0700, Sean Page wrote:
> Greetings list.
>=20
> I am running versions of FreeBSD from 4.9.x to 4.10 p3. Let's say for the
> sake of argument that we're dealing with FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2. I am
> finding that BIND9 (installed to replace the base install of BIND) is tak=
ing
> from 4-8 seconds to resolve a name that isn't cached, where the same look=
up
> on BIND8 will occur in less than a second. I've tested on a half a dozen
> servers split between the 2 versions and the results are always the same.
> Some client applications are timing out with this kind of delay. I recent=
ly
> updated to BIND 9.3.0 hoping to help the problem to no avail. Has anyone
> else been experiencing this?
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I recommend asking on a BIND support list.

Kris

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBlXbRWry0BWjoQKURApLFAJ97fH/RECzkvKT5fqGh10PuzLsHUwCg3LfZ
RVmkHdwPnO2/2UuxZ79v5kA=
=y5l2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--gKMricLos+KVdGMg--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041113025201.GA13657>