Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:39:30 +0300
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>, Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org, asami@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: New rules for naming patches
Message-ID:  <3975CBB2.CE38F8EB@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <3975AFE6.EBB9FB9@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.BSI.4.21.0007190959220.3080-100000@blues.jpj.net> <20000719171403.A13769@cichlids.cichlids.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Langer wrote:

> Thus spake Trevor Johnson (trevor@jpj.net):
>
> > should help make the history more comprehensible:  the patches to a
> > particular source file will automatically go in the same ,v file as
> > patches are created and removed over the lifetime of a port.
>
> Only if you do something like
> patch-subdir1_subdir2_subdir3_file.name
> for each file, which is kinda overhead :)

It may be even worse: patch-subdir1_subdir2_subdir3_file.name__foo__bar.c

if the original file is name_foo_bar.c

>:-|

-Maxim





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3975CBB2.CE38F8EB>