Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jun 2003 23:16:07 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Rob Lahaye <lahaye@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc:        foxfair@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: INDEX: cryptlib-3.1_beta4 Not in due form: '<version>[_<revision>][,<epoch>]'
Message-ID:  <20030622061607.GA92472@rot13.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <3EF53E05.8070605@users.sourceforge.net>
References:  <3EF53E05.8070605@users.sourceforge.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 02:26:29PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:

> This complaint about cryptlib-3.1_beta4 is there only since very recently.
> Is it wrongly added to the ports collection?

The version string is illegal.  The port committer forgot to check
with portlint before comitting.

Kris

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+9UmnWry0BWjoQKURAqhEAKCXFLvcTY7yzDVBZ3m4J+hJdrh9FQCghyZC
kMImMfg7zqH7QO2+0r7UghY=
=Ky3J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf--


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030622061607.GA92472>