Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 20:20:36 +0200 From: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan_KIRIK?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@freebsd.org>, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 Beta2 /etc/rc.d/named script and /etc/defaults/rc.conf Message-ID: <CA%2BdUSyohJhCyMnTyGg0iCiFb_FiD5mVqo2YgG%2BsXsoF0vG=50Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <868B00D6-101A-4B17-995F-A3E2AFE41908@lansing.dk> References: <CAAcX-AFJ__4CDz7%2BabFoRf%2BecrfOZRFXaos1sYnb85=k_BweEw@mail.gmail.com> <20131103220654.GU52889@FreeBSD.org> <6AA4A8E1-CBCE-4C87-A320-BB08EC76715F@lassitu.de> <CA%2BdUSypfj5Ja%2BKi1tikG19na7Dv96foW3HE%2BTEPaNYOUM9r5Cw@mail.gmail.com> <20131104083443.GZ52889@FreeBSD.org> <2B21E123-23BA-4E07-B9DD-9DE1CDE40D08@FreeBSD.org> <20131104163457.GJ52889@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2BdUSyp5JWskKU7_oMxuTsZekimtRs2A%2BmEZm=kS-87jNjF9yQ@mail.gmail.com> <868B00D6-101A-4B17-995F-A3E2AFE41908@lansing.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> wrote: > > > On 06/11/2013, at 14.22, George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote= : > >> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> E> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:41:01AM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote: >> E> > G> > Am 03.11.2013 um 23:06 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff < >> glebius@FreeBSD.org>: >> E> > G> > >> E> > G> > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:05:02PM +0200, =D6zkan KIRIK wrot= e: >> E> > G> > > =D6> Altough bind removed from FreeBSD 10 distribution, >> "/etc/rc.d/named" >> E> > G> > script >> E> > G> > > =D6> still exists. >> E> > G> > > =D6> and this script depends on "/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist= " >> file but >> E> > G> > there is >> E> > G> > > =D6> no such file in source tree. >> E> > G> > > =D6> I think this file was forgotten to be removed. >> E> > G> > > =D6> >> E> > G> > > =D6> And also, named_* definitions still exists in >> /etc/defaults/rc.conf >> E> > G> > file. >> E> > G> > > >> E> > G> > > Please review attached file that removes named from /etc. >> E> > G> > >> E> > G> > It would be great if the port would learn to install its own >> script etc. >> E> > G> > in time for that change. (Unless it=92s already there, and I= =92m >> just too blind >> E> > G> > to see it.) >> E> > G> >> E> > G> No you are not blind. Installing bind from ports still relies on >> the >> E> > G> /etc/rc.d/named script. >> E> > >> E> > Erwin, can you please handle that? >> E> >> E> Things are much worse that this, the ports are completely written >> under the assumption that there is a Bind in base, which of course would >> already break with WITHOUT_BIND before Bind was completely removed. It >> will be hard to fix without breaking the installed base of 8 and 9. Sig= h. >> E> >> E> I'll try to work on it this week, but unfortunately have a full >> schedule of meetings and travel as well. >> > > Suggestion. An option to install the rc script would solve that problem. > > > > If only it was that simple, it would have been done a long time ago. As > Gleb points out, the ports are broken by design. The rc script needs a > complete rewrite, and that's only after fixing all configuration files, > setting up chroot, etc etc and all that while not breaking the installed > base on 8 and 9. I spent most of yesterday on this and if I'm lucky, I'm > halfway through. > > Erwin, sent from a phone at the train station > > Thank you all for your effort! --=20 George Kontostanos --- http://www.aisecure.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BdUSyohJhCyMnTyGg0iCiFb_FiD5mVqo2YgG%2BsXsoF0vG=50Q>